We will show that each of the three relations (3.11),(3.13),(3.14) between n, k, and d derived in Section4.2 implies (3.9), providing d is an integer in (3.11),(3.13) and d is an odd integer in (3.14). In order to make the appendix self-contained, we now re-state these inequalities:
| d |
(9) |
d - 2 |
(11) |
| d |
(12) |
Notice that what we are trying to establish has nothing to do with graphs or codes; this is just manipulation of integer inequalities. In particular, we have following simple lemma.
Lemma11.
If
a
b/c and a, b, c are positive integers,
then
a
(b + a)/(c + 1).
The proof of Lemma11 is straightforward, and is left to the reader. We first deal with (3.14), assuming d is odd. Taking the common denominator and applying (twice) Lemma11, we see that (3.14) implies
Since (d + 1)/2 is an integer for odd d, it follows from (20)
that
.
This may be re-written as:
If
n + 1
0 mod (k + 1) then
,
and (21) clearly implies (3.9).
If
(n + 1)/(k + 1) is an integer, then
(21) is precisely the
equivalent form of (3.9) given in (3.12).
It is easy to see that if d is an odd integer,
then (3.11) implies (3.14). Since this case
was already established above, it remains
to prove (3.11) for even d. Using once again
Lemma11, we see that (3.11) implies
d
2n/(k + 1),
or equivalently
d /2
n/(k + 1). Since d /2 is
an integer for even d, we can take the integer part
of n/(k + 1) in the above expression. It follows that for even d, we have
http://people.bu.edu/trachten